Re: IP4 Space

[William Herrin <bill () herrin us>]

> On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:24 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> > Joel made a remarkable assertion
> > that non-aggregable assignments to end users, the ones still needed
> > for multihoming, would go down under IPv6. I wondered about his
> > reasoning. Stan then offered the surprising clarification that a
> > reduction in the use of NAT would naturally result in a reduction of
> > multihoming.

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Stan Barber <sob () academ com> wrote:
> I was not trying to say there would be a reduction in multihoming. I was
> trying to say that the rate of increase in non-NATed single-homing
> would increase faster than multihoming. I guess I was not very clear.


Hi Stan,

Your logic still escapes me. Network-wise there's not a lot of
difference between a single-homed  IPv4 /32 and a single-homed IPv6
/56. Host-wise there may be a difference but why would you expect that
to impact networks?

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004