nanog mailing list archives

Re: NSP-SEC


From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:30:01 +0200 (IST)

On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, William Pitcock wrote:

On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
trusted communities without leaks.

Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
thing?  This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they
have to be 100% secretive in everything they do, which is total
bullshit.

Just saying.

How exactly would being transparent for the following help Internet security:

"I am seeing a new malware infection vector via port 91714 coming from the IP range of 32.0.0.0/8 that installs a rootkit after visiting the web page http://www.trythisoutnow.com/. In addition, it has credit card and pswd stealing capabilities and sends the details to a maildrop at trythisoutnow () gmail com"

The only upside of being transparent is alerting the miscreant to change the vector and maildrop.

Regards,
Hank


Current thread: