nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP-SEC
From: David Barak <thegameiam () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Total transparency in security matters works about as well as it would for law enforcement: fine for tactical concerns, but not so great for long-term strategic concerns. -David Barak On Fri Mar 19th, 2010 9:44 AM EDT William Pitcock wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:An ongoing area of work is to build better closed, trusted communities without leaks.Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad thing? This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they have to be 100% secretive in everything they do, which is total bullshit. Just saying. William
Current thread:
- Re: NSP-SEC, (continued)
- Re: NSP-SEC Sean Donelan (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC George Imburgia (Mar 20)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC James Bensley (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Rich Kulawiec (Mar 21)
- RE: NSP-SEC Alex Lanstein (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Lorand Jakab (Mar 22)
- Re: NSP-SEC James Bensley (Mar 21)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 21)
- Message not available
- Re: NSP-SEC James Bensley (Mar 22)
- RE: NSP-SEC Adam Stasiniewicz (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- RE: NSP-SEC David Barak (Mar 19)