nanog mailing list archives
Re: NSP-SEC
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:50:00 -0400
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 06:42:44 PDT, Leo Bicknell said:
I'd like to nominate this for the Best of Nanog 2010.
Amen to that. As the Jargon File says, "C|N>K". Unfortunately, I was eating breakfast, and it was corn flakes not coffee. Ouch.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC David Conrad (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 18)
- Re: NSP-SEC Paul WALL (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Brielle Bruns (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Jorge Amodio (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Michael Dillon (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC Leo Bicknell (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC John Kristoff (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity bmanning (Mar 19)
- RE: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Green, Tim R (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity Guillaume FORTAINE (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 19)
- Open Security (was Re:[a string that stops delivery here]) Larry Sheldon (Mar 19)
- Re: NSP-SEC William Pitcock (Mar 18)