nanog mailing list archives
Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?"
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:55:06 -0400
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 05:28:40 -0000, Michael Sokolov said:
Kevin Oberman <oberman () es net> wrote:And, if you are using a 1988 TCP stack on a 4.3 system, you are not likely to ever efficiently utilize a higher speed linkWhat higher speed link? I'm very happy with 384 kbps symmetric, using SDSL as ARPANET replacement. I have designed and built my own SDSL to EIA-530 CSU/DSU so I can use a Cisco 2500 router instead of that nasty new-fangled Netopia which has (oh horror!) RJ45 Ethernet instead of proper AUI. Oh, did I forget to mention that my Ethernet is coaxial? To me all that UTP stuff isn't true Ethernet.
I call Poe's Law on this one. Mostly because I can't tell which side this one is on. ;)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?", (continued)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Stefan (Mar 29)
- RE: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Dylan Ebner (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Steve Meuse (Mar 26)
- RE: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Olsen, Jason (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Jared Mauch (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Frank A. Coluccio (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Frank A. Coluccio (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Michael Sokolov (Mar 26)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Kevin Oberman (Mar 29)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Michael Sokolov (Mar 29)
- Re: "Is TDM going the way of dial-up?" Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 30)