nanog mailing list archives
Re: IP4 Space
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm () rollernet us>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:06:15 -0800
On 3/4/10 10:52 AM, Thomas Magill wrote:
So to start off, I'm new to following this list so if these points have already been beaten into the ground, feel free to tell me to shut up. So two things I wonder about the preservation of current IP4 space and delaying IP6 are: 1. Why don't providers use /31 addresses for P2P links? This works fine per rfc 3021 but nobody seems to believe it or use it. Are there any major manufacturers out there that do not support it?
I posed this to the list in January, and learned that apparently there are still some vendors whose products choke with presented with a /31. Search for thread "Using /31 for router links". ~Seth
Current thread:
- IP4 Space Thomas Magill (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Jared Mauch (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Seth Mattinen (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Mark Newton (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 04)
- RE: IP4 Space Thomas Magill (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space Mark Newton (Mar 04)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space David Conrad (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 05)
- Re: IP4 Space Owen DeLong (Mar 04)