nanog mailing list archives

Re: ISP Responsibilities [WAS: Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers]


From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:51:10 -0500

On 6/9/2010 06:14, Owen DeLong wrote:

On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

To cut through the noise and non-relevant discussion, let's see if we can
boil this down to a couple of issues:

1. Should ISPs be responsible for abuse from within their customer base?

      Yes, but, there should be an exemption from liability for ISPs that take
      action to resolve the situation within 24 hours of first awareness (by
      either internal detection or external report).

What happened to the acronyms "AUP" and "TOS"?

-- 
Somebody should have said:
A democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.

Freedom under a constitutional republic is a well armed lamb contesting
the vote.

Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca

ICBM Targeting Information:  http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml

        


Current thread: