nanog mailing list archives
Re: ASR1002
From: gordon b slater <gordslater () ieee org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:59:32 +0000
Inline (and diverse) replies, as it's more of a rant, but slightly relevant to the list ops if not the OP topic: 1 - On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 15:50 +0800, NetYourLife2007 wrote (well, at least his mailer declared itself to be...):
Mailer: Foxmail 6, 15, 201, 22 [cn]
Kenny's mail client may be slightly unfamiliar to most nanog users :) Not sure if that's relevant but it may be a contributory factor. Maybe the problem is that we're all too old and can remember what headers are and what they're useful for, but developers of these "modern" mail clients just want to hide all feature that even so much as _look like_ they have come from a CLI client. For example, I know several otherwise competent people who glaze over and fall asleep when I mention the Reply To: field. 2 - On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Jim Mercer wrote:
i still read most of my mail with mutt, but in my experience, many "modern" interfaces (gmail/thunderrbird/etc) don't make it intuative to find and/or read the headers.
agreed, after 18 month of trying to comply I still can't drive this Evolution thing that most "new Linux-on-the-Desktop" users get as a default install. I couldn't even find out how to bind the "h" key to headers after a month of looking, for example. I live in hope for a Mutt Bindings `extension`, if some developer can wake their grandparents for some memories. On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 09:50 +0100, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
In gmail you click "show details" and then there is a "unsubscribe from this mailing list"-link you can click. Might not be perfectly intuitive, but it's full functionality and quite easy.
Thank you, I've now (and only now) just found a similar thingy in this client. 18 months down the line....grrr Yet just testing it, it works for nanog, but not for 2 other lists I'm in, with similar correct headers 8-{ Are we (or rather the developers) losing the plot? I think many of today's "web-users" may consider email old-fashioned, so if the new `app-for-that` culture doesn't provide easy/basic access to `old-fashioned` features, things may slowly turn into interface soup. And while I'm ranting, why has my client suddenly borked into 132 column mode? <sigh> Ahem now, rant off/relevance on: Prediction: We may have to, in the coming years, for the above reasons and more, reduce the monthly FAQ posting to bi-weekly if the unsubscribe-to-(signal+noise) ratio increases significantly. Or a single-line howto unsubscribe message biweekly. Or something. Meh. de Gord [in a bad, bad, depressive mood due to huge IMAP restore issues out of my control] -- Sudo is prior art. Fools or thieves? You decide.
Current thread:
- ASR1002 Kenny Sallee (Jan 06)
- Re: ASR1002 Mark Jackson (Jan 06)
- Re: ASR1002 Jared Mauch (Jan 06)
- Re: ASR1002 McDonald Richards (Jan 06)
- Re: ASR1002 Bill Blackford (Jan 06)
- Re: ASR1002 Kenny Sallee (Jan 06)
- Re: ASR1002 McDonald Richards (Jan 06)
- Re: ASR1002 NetYourLife2007 (Jan 18)
- Re: ASR1002 Randy Bush (Jan 19)
- Re: ASR1002 Jim Mercer (Jan 19)
- Re: ASR1002 Mikael Abrahamsson (Jan 19)
- Re: ASR1002 Randy Bush (Jan 19)
- Re: ASR1002 gordon b slater (Jan 19)
- OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002 Jim Mercer (Jan 19)
- Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002 gordon b slater (Jan 19)
- Message not available
- Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002 gordon b slater (Jan 20)
- Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002 Jim Mercer (Jan 20)
- Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002 gordon b slater (Jan 20)
- Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002 Jorge Amodio (Jan 20)
- Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002 Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 20)
- Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002 Mr. James W. Laferriere (Jan 20)
- Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002 Mark Smith (Jan 20)
- Re: OT: old farts recollecting -- Re: ASR1002 Randy Bush (Jan 20)