nanog mailing list archives

Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?)

From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew () eeph com>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:18:21 -0800

Mike Lyon wrote:

I think the he.net problems occurred before the quake...

-Mike

They did. I was looking at what it looked like from here when thebuilding started swaying.


Matthew Kaufman

Current thread:

Re: he.net down/slow?, (continued)
- - - Re: he.net down/slow? Joe Greco (Jan 10)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? Joe Greco (Jan 10)
    - RE: he.net down/slow? Michael J. Hartwick (Jan 11)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? JC Dill (Jan 11)
    - Re: he.net down/slow? William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Jed Smith (Jan 07)
- 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) JC Dill (Jan 07)
  - Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Seth Mattinen (Jan 07)
  - Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Mike Lyon (Jan 07)
    - Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Matthew Kaufman (Jan 07)
    - Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) John Adams (Jan 07)
    - Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Paul Ferguson (Jan 07)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Tim Burke (Jan 07)
  - RE: he.net down/slow? Paul Stewart (Jan 07)