nanog mailing list archives
Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?)
From: Mike Lyon <mike.lyon () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:01:17 -0800
I think the he.net problems occurred before the quake... -Mike On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:56 AM, JC Dill <jcdill.lists () gmail com> wrote:
Brian Johnson wrote:Has anyone noticed that accessing http://www.he.net or http://ipv6.he.net is either slow or inaccessible?We had a 4.1 earthquake here in the SF Bay area at about 10:09 PST. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsus/Quakes/nc71336726.php I believe he.net's primary data center is located in the east bay, relatively near to the epicenter of this quake. This was a small quake, but perhaps a plug got jostled loose during the shaking. Or perhaps the quake is entirely unrelated to your issue. jc
Current thread:
- Re: he.net down/slow?, (continued)
- Re: he.net down/slow? William Herrin (Jan 09)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Joe Greco (Jan 10)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 10)
- Re: he.net down/slow? Joe Greco (Jan 10)
- RE: he.net down/slow? Michael J. Hartwick (Jan 11)
- Re: he.net down/slow? JC Dill (Jan 11)
- Re: he.net down/slow? William Herrin (Jan 11)
- Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Seth Mattinen (Jan 07)
- Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Mike Lyon (Jan 07)
- Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Matthew Kaufman (Jan 07)
- Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) John Adams (Jan 07)
- Re: 4.1 earthquake in SF Bay region (was Re: he.net down/slow?) Paul Ferguson (Jan 07)
- RE: he.net down/slow? Paul Stewart (Jan 07)