nanog mailing list archives
RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials
From: "TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:07:11 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: tvest () eyeconomics com [mailto:tvest () eyeconomics com] Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 08:12 To: Richard Barnes Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
<SNIP>
But then that begs the question of why lots of other very large retail Internet access providers have not indicated that they're committed to the same course of action (?). They're certainly not the only provider that employs a public IP address- intensive access model, so where are the other retail IPv6 trial announcements/pre-announcements?
Other providers are moving in that direction, atleast a couple are (as a swag) 6-18 months behind Comcast ... /TJ
Current thread:
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials, (continued)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 29)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials William McCall (Jan 27)
- RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials George Bonser (Jan 27)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Kevin Oberman (Jan 27)
- RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials George Bonser (Jan 27)
- RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials Scott Berkman (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials steve pirk [egrep] (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Joe Hamelin (Jan 28)
- RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials George Bonser (Jan 27)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Richard Barnes (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials tvest (Jan 28)
- RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials TJ (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials tvest (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Kevin Oberman (Jan 28)
- RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials Paul Stewart (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Joakim Aronius (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Tim Durack (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Chris Gotstein (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Tim Durack (Jan 28)
- RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials TJ (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Joel Jaeggli (Jan 31)