nanog mailing list archives
RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials
From: "TJ" <trejrco () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:26:06 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: Richard Barnes [mailto:richard.barnes () gmail com] Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 07:47 To: Kevin Oberman Cc: nanog () nanog org Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials What I've heard is that the driver is IPv4 exhaustion: Comcast is starting to have enough subscribers that it can't address them all out of 10/8 -- ~millions of subscribers, each with >1 IP address (e.g., for user data / control of the cable box).
++1, reference: http://www.apricot.net/apricot2006/slides/conf/wednesday/Alain_Durand-Archit ecture-external.ppt /TJ
Current thread:
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials, (continued)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Richard Barnes (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials tvest (Jan 28)
- RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials TJ (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials tvest (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Kevin Oberman (Jan 28)
- RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials Paul Stewart (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Joakim Aronius (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Tim Durack (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Chris Gotstein (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Tim Durack (Jan 28)
- RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials TJ (Jan 28)
- Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Joel Jaeggli (Jan 31)