nanog mailing list archives

Re: Using /126 for IPv6 router links


From: Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:08:36 +1030

On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:09:11 -0800
Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:


On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

The general intent of the /48 allocation is that it is large enough for
nearly everybody, with nearly everybody including all but the largest
of organisations.

the general intent of a class B allocation is that it is large enough
for nearly everybody, with nearly everybody including all but the
largest of organisations.

hmmmmm

randy

That would, indeed, work if we weren't short of class B networks
to assign.


And we shrunk the Internet.



Current thread: