nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus...
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 18 Feb 2010 21:58:55 -0000
In article <4B7DA21C.1060608 () foobar org> you write:
On 18/02/2010 10:40, Michelle Sullivan wrote:They seem to be doing that a lot of late. They also contacted my employer and demanded $100k/yr(?) for having a "Use Spamhaus RBL" in our software.I sympathise. It's very frustrating when you try to deal with these anti-spam outfits in a reasonable way and you're met with almost completely arbitrary b/s.
Spamhaus has a published price list. If you use them in a separate filtering service you sell, the price is considerably higher than if you use them as part of mail service. R's, John
Current thread:
- Re: Spamhaus..., (continued)
- Re: Spamhaus... Rich Kulawiec (Feb 24)
- Re: Spamhaus... William Herrin (Feb 24)
- RE: Spamhaus... Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 21)
- RE: Spamhaus... Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Paul Vixie (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 22)
- Re: Spamhaus... Steven Champeon (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Nick Hilliard (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Christopher Morrow (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Marc Powell (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... Jon Lewis (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 20)