nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus...
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:25:00 +0000
On 18/02/2010 10:40, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
They seem to be doing that a lot of late. They also contacted my employer and demanded $100k/yr(?) for having a "Use Spamhaus RBL" in our software.
I sympathise. It's very frustrating when you try to deal with these anti-spam outfits in a reasonable way and you're met with almost completely arbitrary b/s. Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Spamhaus..., (continued)
- Re: Spamhaus... Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Rich Kulawiec (Feb 24)
- Re: Spamhaus... William Herrin (Feb 24)
- RE: Spamhaus... Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 21)
- RE: Spamhaus... Tomas L. Byrnes (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Paul Vixie (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 21)
- Re: Spamhaus... Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 22)
- Re: Spamhaus... Steven Champeon (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Christopher Morrow (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Marc Powell (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 19)
- Re: Spamhaus... Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 20)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 20)