nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus...
From: Michelle Sullivan <matthew () sorbs net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:40:17 +0100
Laczo, Louis wrote:
Folks, I'm looking for comments / suggestions / opinions from any providers that have been contacted by spamhaus about excessive queries originating from their DNS resolvers, typically, as a proxy for customers. I know that certain large DNS providers (i.e. google and level3) have either been banned or have voluntarily blocked spamhaus queries by their resolvers. We're currently in discussion with spamhaus and I wanted to see how others may have handled this.
They seem to be doing that a lot of late. They also contacted my employer and demanded $100k/yr(?) for having a "Use Spamhaus RBL" in our software. Next version will not have the ability to query Spamhaus unless a user configures it themselves in the "Custom RBL" settings. Michelle ? = could have been more, not sure without checking with the CEO, result was the same.
Current thread:
- Spamhaus... Laczo, Louis (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 17)
- RE: Spamhaus... Paul Stewart (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Matthew Black (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Dave Sparro (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Jason Bertoch (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Crist Clark (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... William Warren (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Crist Clark (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Larry Sheldon (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Jon Lewis (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Crist Clark (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Rich Kulawiec (Feb 19)