nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spamhaus...
From: John Levine <johnl () iecc com>
Date: 18 Feb 2010 00:35:14 -0000
When we licensed Spamhaus a few years back, they required us to set-up a DNS slave server instead of querying against their public server. They had a special DNS client that allowed partial zone updates. Turns out we downloaded huge hourly updates.
They now give you the choice of rsync or queries to non-public servers. Unless you have a humungous mail system, queries are cheaper and certainly less hassle.
We no longer use Spamhaus, relying instead upon Sender Base Reputation Scores (IronPort).
How does the price compare? R's, John
Current thread:
- Spamhaus... Laczo, Louis (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 17)
- RE: Spamhaus... Paul Stewart (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Matthew Black (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Dave Sparro (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... John Levine (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Jason Bertoch (Feb 17)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Crist Clark (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... William Warren (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Michelle Sullivan (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Crist Clark (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Larry Sheldon (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... James Hess (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Jon Lewis (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Crist Clark (Feb 18)
- Re: Spamhaus... Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 17)