nanog mailing list archives
RE: Fiber Cut in CA?
From: "Scott Berkman" <scott () sberkman net>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:41:59 -0500
Cross-country Fibers very often follow existing utility rights of way. So even in a wide open desert, the places the fibers go are the "busy" spots. Sometimes its train tracks, sometimes its gas pipelines, sometimes its electric, sometimes it’s a road, but very rarely is fiber like that "on its own". So the cut was likely construction on whatever the fiber was near. The other option is that the fiber provider was actually doing maintenance (adding capacity, fixing a troubled strand) and did the damage themselves. -Scott -----Original Message----- From: Bret Clark [mailto:bclark () spectraaccess com] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 6:37 PM To: nanog Subject: Re: Fiber Cut in CA? Good point...so if the cut is in the middle of nowhere without easy access...then how the hell did it get cut? Malicious? Matt Simmons wrote: And in an open desert, back hoes can smell fiber from miles away. On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Bill Stewart [1]<nonobvious () gmail com> wrote: On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:04 AM, [2]<charles () knownelement com> wrote: That is one long protect path. Yikes. There be mountains in the way, with deserts in between, and not a lot of people to justify diversity or railroads and highways to run it along. Not many carriers have more than one fiber route across Arizona and New Mexico, especially for the newer high-capacity fibers (i.e. built this millennium, after the financial excesses of the 90s.) I'm no longer current on what routes are being used by what carriers, but if you don't have two routes across northern Arizona ( I-10/I-40, with restoration routes like Barstow->LasVegas->Flagstaff->Phoenix), then the next alternative is Barstow->LasVegas->SaltLakeCity->Denver, at which point some carriers have routes down to Phoenix via Tucumcari or Amarillo, and the rest are going to go through Dallas, and anybody who doesn't have the LasVegas->SLC route is going to use Sacramento->SLC->Denver, possibly also including San Jose, depending on what routes they've got across California. So, yeah, instead of the nice short 2200-mile restoration routes you can use if SF->Seattle fails, cable cuts in the Southwest can be really long... -- ---- Thanks; Bill Note that this isn't my regular email account - It's still experimental so far. And Google probably logs and indexes everything you send it. References 1. mailto:nonobvious () gmail com 2. mailto:charles () knownelement com
Current thread:
- Fiber Cut in CA? Micheal Patterson (Feb 01)
- Re: Fiber Cut in CA? Michael J McCafferty (Feb 01)
- Re: Fiber Cut in CA? Kevin Oberman (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fiber Cut in CA? charles (Feb 02)
- Re: Fiber Cut in CA? Bill Stewart (Feb 02)
- Re: Fiber Cut in CA? Matt Simmons (Feb 02)
- Re: Fiber Cut in CA? Bret Clark (Feb 02)
- Re: Fiber Cut in CA? Steven Bellovin (Feb 02)
- RE: Fiber Cut in CA? Scott Berkman (Feb 02)
- RE: Fiber Cut in CA? Michael J McCafferty (Feb 02)
- Re: Fiber Cut in CA? Blake Covarrubias (Feb 02)
- Re: Fiber Cut in CA? Bill Stewart (Feb 02)
- Re: Fiber Cut in CA? Michael J McCafferty (Feb 01)