nanog mailing list archives
Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 14:09:40 +1300
On 13/02/2010, at 2:03 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 2/12/2010 15:03, Steve Bertrand wrote:What time frame do you determine to be instability? The following is from a box that has ~25 neighbours. Since the box was reloaded (6w3d ago), I've had the same uptime with the Team Cymru neighbours as I do with internal gear. I can't say that I've experienced any instability at all. It is not uncommon for me to have noticed uptimes well beyond 30w.Mine are not so good: Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd 38.229.0.5 4 65333 115856 115859 16411814 0 0 01:33:51 30 68.22.187.24 4 65333 26968 29671 16311293 0 0 2w4d 30 I see you have 68.22.187.24 in your list too, but my uptime is less. Are you using increased hold times?
Nevermind BGP timers, do you normally do well holding TCP connections open for weeks on end across the Internet? -- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- CYMRU Bogon Peering Thomas Magill (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Bill Blackford (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Mr. James W. Laferriere (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Jack Carrozzo (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Tim Wilde (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Seth Mattinen (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Steve Bertrand (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Seth Mattinen (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Nathan Ward (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Steve Bertrand (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Mr. James W. Laferriere (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Rob Thomas (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Seth Mattinen (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Bill Blackford (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Nick Hilliard (Feb 12)
- Re: CYMRU Bogon Peering Jack Carrozzo (Feb 12)
- RE: CYMRU Bogon Peering Thomas Magill (Feb 12)