nanog mailing list archives
Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways?
From: Brandon Ewing <nicotine () warningg com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 12:16:27 -0600
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 12:45:13PM -0500, David Birnbaum wrote:
We have noticed a lot of issues with Asterisk 1.2 and some 1.4 rollouts. FreePBX had some truck-sized holes in it.
FreePBX 2.6.0 defaults to refusing anonymous SIP calls. If you enable inbound anonymous calls, it includes only the "from-trunk" context, making it behave like a standard incoming over over a configured trunk. If you've configured FreePBX to allow outgoing calls from the trunk context, you have larger problems in general. -- Brandon Ewing (nicotine () warningg com)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- How common are wide open SIP gateways? Drew Weaver (Feb 05)
- Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways? Seth Mattinen (Feb 05)
- Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways? David Birnbaum (Feb 05)
- Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways? Brandon Ewing (Feb 05)
- Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways? David Birnbaum (Feb 05)
- RE: How common are wide open SIP gateways? Drew Weaver (Feb 05)
- Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways? Brandon Ewing (Feb 05)
- Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways? Scott Howard (Feb 05)
- Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways? John Todd (Feb 06)
- Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways? Jon Lewis (Feb 05)
- Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways? Chris Hills (Feb 05)
- Re: How common are wide open SIP gateways? Jonathan Thurman (Feb 05)