nanog mailing list archives
Re: How polluted is 1/8?
From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner () cluebyfour org>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:26:34 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Nathan Ward wrote:
On 4/02/2010, at 9:19 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:I would hope that the APNIC would opt not to assign networks that would contain 1.1.1.1 or 1.2.3.4 to customers for exactly that reason. The signal-to-noise ratio for those addresses is likely pretty high. The noise is likely contained on many internal networks for now because a corresponding route doesn't show up in the global routing table at the moment. Once that changes....1.1.1/24 and 1.2.3/24 are assigned to APNIC. Unless they release them, the general public will not get addresses in these.
Yes, I did see that. What I noticed yesterday was that there were no prefixes that cover 1.1.1.1 or 1.2.3.4 being announced globally at that
point. jms
Current thread:
- Re: How polluted is 1/8?, (continued)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 04)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Tico (Feb 04)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Jared Mauch (Feb 04)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Petri Helenius (Feb 07)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Joel M Snyder (Feb 03)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Justin M. Streiner (Feb 03)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Larry Sheldon (Feb 03)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Justin M. Streiner (Feb 03)
- RE: How polluted is 1/8? Deepak Jain (Feb 03)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Justin M. Streiner (Feb 03)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Nathan Ward (Feb 03)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Justin M. Streiner (Feb 04)