nanog mailing list archives
Re: How polluted is 1/8?
From: Nathan Ward <nanog () daork net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 11:47:53 +1300
On 4/02/2010, at 9:19 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
I would hope that the APNIC would opt not to assign networks that would contain 1.1.1.1 or 1.2.3.4 to customers for exactly that reason. The signal-to-noise ratio for those addresses is likely pretty high. The noise is likely contained on many internal networks for now because a corresponding route doesn't show up in the global routing table at the moment. Once that changes....
1.1.1/24 and 1.2.3/24 are assigned to APNIC. Unless they release them, the general public will not get addresses in these. -- Nathan Ward
Current thread:
- Re: How polluted is 1/8?, (continued)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Christopher Morrow (Feb 04)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 04)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Tico (Feb 04)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Jared Mauch (Feb 04)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Petri Helenius (Feb 07)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Justin M. Streiner (Feb 03)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Larry Sheldon (Feb 03)
- Re: How polluted is 1/8? Justin M. Streiner (Feb 03)
- RE: How polluted is 1/8? Deepak Jain (Feb 03)