nanog mailing list archives
Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 07:38:34 -0500
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 05:49:53PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:fair game for reverse billing. ?If it does, it's going to completely eliminate "transit" as a commercial offering; instead, we'll all be stuck doing settlements in every direction for traffic...and that's just *way* too much paperwork. ?^_^;oh! that's the LD network.. that worked out so darned well, can we do it again? and can we have the ITU manage it for us? please? please? please? :)
Obviously, that's what (3) and GLBX want back. Perhps they are feeling nostalgic. -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Jeff Young (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Frank Bulk (Dec 01)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions William Allen Simpson (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Jeffrey Lyon (Dec 02)
- RE: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Frank Bulk (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Matthew Petach (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Christopher Morrow (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Joe Provo (Dec 03)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions Brandon Ross (Dec 02)
- Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's Actions William Allen Simpson (Dec 02)