nanog mailing list archives

Re: Want to move to all 208V for server racks


From: Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:40:36 +0000

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 22:07, Ricky Beam <jfbeam () gmail com> wrote:
...
I think they are now a violation of the NEC.  And they were delisted by UL
years ago.  They pose a hazard as they will not react fast enough to prevent
a fatal shock. (and the only one's I've ever seen were outlawed as the
breaker itself was a fire hazard.)

While I do not have a copy of NFPA 70-2011 (the latest latest, released
a few months ago), my reading of NFPA 70-2008 still allows GFCI
breakers (NFPA 70 is the official name for NEC).  Personally, I
prefer to specify and use GFCI outlets (and I tend to not daisy
chain) so that the the fault is next to the use (and no collateral
outages occur).  Of course, specific breakers may not meet the
newest requirements.


Current thread: