nanog mailing list archives
Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:11:37 -0400
On Aug 16, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick () ianai net> said:1) Use different prefixes. A single prefix going down should not kill your entire network. (Nameservers and resolvers being unreachable breaks the whole Internet as far as users are concerned.)How do you do this in the IPv6 world, where I get a single /32? Will others accept announcements of two /33s to better handle things like this?
Oooooooooobviously I was not thinking clearly, since I was only considering v4. =) But you do what you can. Some people have only a single v4 prefixes as well. If you can't use more than one prefix, then don't. Other good suggestions were things like ensuring the default exit point for each NS was a different vector. If you have only one exit point, that is not possible. But it does not mean the suggestion is bad. -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers, (continued)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Jared Mauch (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Joe Greco (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Phil Vandry (Aug 18)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Lyndon Nerenberg (Aug 18)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Joe Greco (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Chris Adams (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Jared Mauch (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers John Kristoff (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Doug Barton (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Arie Vayner (Aug 16)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Jared Mauch (Aug 16)