nanog mailing list archives
Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers
From: Aria Stewart <aredridel () nbtsc org>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:12:06 -0600
On Aug 16, 2010, at 12:49 AM, Mike wrote:
Hi Folks, I am needing to renumber some core infrastructure - namely, my nameservers and my resolvers - and I was wondering if the collective wisdom still says heck yes keep this stuff all on seperate subnets away from eachother? Anyone got advice either way? Should I try to give sequential numbers to my resolvers for the benefit of consultants ... like .11, .22 and .33 for my server ips?
Resolvers being easily memorable is nice, since they get keyed in by IP. Authority servers are referred to by name, so IP matters less. Definitely keep an authority server in another prefix if you can, and resolvers in different prefixes is also nice -- but that's more a question of redundancy, not numbering. Other than that, go dense. Addresses are starting to get scarce. Aria Stewart
Current thread:
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers, (continued)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Phil Vandry (Aug 18)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Lyndon Nerenberg (Aug 18)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Joe Greco (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Chris Adams (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Jared Mauch (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers John Kristoff (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Doug Barton (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Patrick W. Gilmore (Aug 16)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Arie Vayner (Aug 16)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Jared Mauch (Aug 16)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 17)
- Re: Numbering nameservers and resolvers Robert E. Seastrom (Aug 18)