nanog mailing list archives
Re: Lightly used IP addresses
From: Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon () blacklotus net>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:31:07 +0430
John, That was just the elevator speech, I wouldn't go off and write an entire proposal without a better understanding on how the community at large feels about the issue and exactly where the boundary would be drawn. My intent was not primarily cost, the registration fees are indeed low. I was just musing that limiting scope would have the ripple effect of reducing budget and thus putting more money in the hands of operators. It would be like a stimulus that doesn't cost any tax payer money ;). Best regards, Jeff On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:32 PM, John Curran <jcurran () arin net> wrote:
On Aug 15, 2010, at 11:31 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:Would the policy process be an appropriate venue for a proposition to change the ARIN mission, restricting it's activities exclusively to registration services while requiring a reduction in fees and budget?Jeffrey - Some historical perspective: ARIN not raised fees to my knowledge, but has actually lowered them 4 or 5 times over its 12 year history. ARIN's mission is set by the Board of Trustees, and lies within the purposes of the articles of incorporation of ARIN. I'll note that the articles encompass remarkable breadth, so the setting the mission turns out to be fairly important to keep ARIN focused appropriately. We have added initiatives in the past (e.g. this years extensive education and outreach regarding IPv4/IPv6) based on input received (predominantly at the Public Policy and Members meeting) and can remove them just as easily, but setting mission does not lie per se within the Policy process; it is a Board function to review and update the mission periodically. (Two minor notes: if you want an *ongoing* restraint on mission scope, it would really need be placed by the Board into the Bylaws with an significant hurdle precluding future revision, and should have some specificity, e.g. "exclusively registration services" could easily be read as either including or excluding abuse/fraud investigation, depending on the particular reader's inclination) /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
-- Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team jeffrey.lyon () blacklotus net | http://www.blacklotus.net Black Lotus Communications of The IRC Company, Inc. Follow us on Twitter at http://twitter.com/ddosprotection to find out about news, promotions, and (gasp!) system outages which are updated in real time. Platinum sponsor of HostingCon 2010. Come to Austin, TX on July 19 - 21 to find out how to "protect your booty."
Current thread:
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Randy Bush (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Owen DeLong (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Jeffrey Lyon (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Jeffrey Lyon (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses N. Yaakov Ziskind (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses William Herrin (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Owen DeLong (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 16)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Brett Frankenberger (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Owen DeLong (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses Owen DeLong (Aug 15)
- Re: Lightly used IP addresses John Curran (Aug 15)