nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: David Conrad <drc () virtualized org>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 13:52:24 -1000
On Apr 11, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:
i'd like to pick the easiest problem and for that reason i'm urging dual-stack ipv4/ipv6 for all networks new or old.
Is anyone arguing against this? The problem is what happens when there isn't sufficient IPv4 to do dual stack. Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 James Hess (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 Stephen Repetski (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 Frank Bulk (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 William Warren (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Andrews (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Paul Vixie (Apr 12)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 12)
- Re: legacy /8 Florian Weimer (Apr 12)
- Re: legacy /8 Owen DeLong (Apr 11)
- Re: legacy /8 Mark Andrews (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Dillon (Apr 03)
- RE: legacy /8 Frank Bulk (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Zaid Ali (Apr 03)