Re: Mail Submission Protocol

[Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>]

Happily Microsoft have fixed their smtps stupidity, so you only need  
to support it on the server if you need to support users running old  
versions of Outlook etc. There was never anything particularly wrong  
with smtps, apart from a dogma in the IETF that it is architecturally  
wrong. The consensus now is that it was wrong to rescind the port  
allocation, because that completely failed to stop people (er,  
Microsoft) from deploying smtps, and just led to interop problems.

Tony (on his iPod).
--
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot () dotat at>  http://dotat.at/


On 28 Apr 2010, at 01:55, Jeroen van Aart <jeroen () mompl net> wrote:

> Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> > i recently had the problem that an lotus notes server insisted on
> > sending emails to one of our clients via port 465. so having  
> > mandatory
> > authentication there actually broke delivery for an exchange sender.
>
> Leave it "broken" for the other end that is. Only way to force them  
> to fix it.
>
> The only acceptable, and standard, way to submit email these days is  
> using port 587 with TLS. And if you have users with broken clients,  
> they can use webmail behind https. I am against facilitating (and  
> thus perpetuating the existence of) old broken clients by making  
> available port 465.
>
> Regards,
> Jeroen
>
> --
> http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/