nanog mailing list archives
Re: legacy /8
From: Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:33:23 -0700
Larry Sheldon wrote:
On 4/2/2010 19:25, Randy Bush wrote:IPv6 as effectively reindroduced classful addressing.but it's not gonna be a problem this time, right? after all, 32^h^h128^h^h^h64 bits is more than we will ever need, right?Just like last time.
Oh brother. "Last time" everybody thought it was a geek science experiment at best.
With IPv6, IP at least had conquered the known universe. Mike
Current thread:
- Re: legacy /8, (continued)
- Re: legacy /8 Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Matthew Kaufman (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Barry Shein (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 jim deleskie (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Robert Brockway (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 David Conrad (Apr 03)
- Re: legacy /8 Larry Sheldon (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Michael Thomas (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 Joe Johnson (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Majdi S. Abbas (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 bmanning (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Randy Bush (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 Jim Burwell (Apr 02)
- RE: legacy /8 George Bonser (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 jim deleskie (Apr 02)
- Re: legacy /8 John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 02)