nanog mailing list archives

Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?


From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault () viagenie ca>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:03:09 -0400

On 04/20/2010 04:51 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
uPNP at a larger scale? Would require some serious security and
scalability analysis.

This is the latest proposal. The Security Considerations section needs
some love...

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-softwire-port-control-protocol

Simon
-- 
NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server        --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0               --> http://www.vcarddav.org


Current thread: