nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering]
From: Dave Temkin <davet1 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:19:12 -0700
Randy Bush wrote:
The only thing Patrick is guilty of is not providing enough context. The party at fault here is Cogent. If you re-read the entire thread and speak with Mike Leber, you'll find that HE offered peering and/or transit, for free, to Cogent - like they do to everyone else, and Cogent didn't take it, providing for the segmentation we saw.As for accusations, I challenge you to show where I accused them of anything.From: patrick () ianai net (Patrick W. Gilmore) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:09:58 -0400 Subject: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering In-Reply-To: <a05493650910120441i27550f17qaa7d3377824afdda () mail gmail com> References: <a05493650910120441i27550f17qaa7d3377824afdda () mail gmail com> Message-ID: <0A37FD5D-D9D1-4D89-AC8A-105612BB8E39 () ianai net> ...It is sad to see that networks which used to care about connectivity, peering, latency, etc., when they are small change their mind when they are "big". The most recent example is Cogent, an open peer who decided to turn down peers when they reached transit free status.I never thought HE would be one of those networks.
-Dave
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering Randy Bush (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering Steve Bertrand (Oct 12)
- Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 13)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Phil Regnauld (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Randy Bush (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Dave Temkin (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Mike Leber (Oct 14)
- Re: Is v6 as important as v4? Of course not [was: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering] Charles Wyble (Oct 14)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Jeff McAdams (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Mark Andrews (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Bret Clark (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Mark Andrews (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Seth Mattinen (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy David Conrad (Oct 12)
- Re: IPv6 internet broken, Verizon route prefix length policy Owen DeLong (Oct 12)