nanog mailing list archives

Re: ISP customer assignments


From: Adrian Chadd <adrian () creative net au>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:09:57 +0800

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Robert.E.VanOrmer () frb gov wrote:

The address space is daunting in scale as you have noted, but I don't see
any lessons learned in address allocation between IPv6 and IPv4.  Consider

A lesson learned is that thinking about address allocation is something 
you do not want to spend too many precious seconds of your life on. 
That's one reason why the space was designed to be so big.  Being 
penny-wise and pound-foolish doesn't really save you much in the IPv6 
address space.

.. address aggregation?
.. convergence time?

I'm sorry, but seeing a good fraction of my local IX simply containing
a few ISP's deaggregated view of their "local" internal networks versus
a sensible allocation policy makes me cry. IPv6 may just make this
worse. IPv6 certainly won't make it "better".



adrian


Current thread: