nanog mailing list archives
Re: ISP customer assignments
From: David Andersen <dga () cs cmu edu>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 19:59:47 -0400
On Oct 5, 2009, at 7:50 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
I'm perplexed. At what size address would people stop worrying about the "finite" address space? 256 bits? 1024 bits?I just don't get it. It's not like people get stressed out about running out of name space in English which is probably more "finite" than ipv6.
Unless you're trying to find a nice, catchy, short domain name. ;-)But seriously: Many people don't seem to have good intuition about really big numbers. Say, on the order of 2^128. The same thing comes up in discussions about hash collisions in, e.g., content based naming with a 160-bit namespace. I think it's because the numbers are so astronomically big, that without some amount of math and having thought about it with paper and pencil, people automatically scale the #s into terms they can think of as "really big" (like, # of people on earth). So when they think about the 128-bit namespace, they apply intuition that works for a 35-bit namespace...
-Dave
Current thread:
- Re: ISP customer assignments, (continued)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 05)
- Message not available
- Re: ISP customer assignments Dan White (Oct 06)
- Re: ISP customer assignments TJ (Oct 06)
- Re: ISP customer assignments James Hess (Oct 06)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Michael Dillon (Oct 08)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Steven Bellovin (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Owen DeLong (Oct 05)
- RE: ISP customer assignments Lee Howard (Oct 06)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Michael Thomas (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments David Andersen (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Michael Thomas (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments David Barak (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments David Conrad (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Adrian Chadd (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Joe Greco (Oct 05)
- Re: ISP customer assignments Adrian Chadd (Oct 05)