nanog mailing list archives

Re: about interdomain multipath routing.


From: Steven King <sking () kingrst com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:13:46 -0500

We use multipath setups for our EIGRP and iBGP configurations for our
internal routing as well. Although for larger networks iBGP multipath
might be of use due to memory limitations on a lot of devices.

Doug Lane wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:
  
I've outlawed the use of multihop eBGP for load-sharing here; when we get
multiple links off the same router to a peer or upstream, they are configured
with multipath.  We've got hundreds of BGP sessions across the network
configured with multipath on them.

    

Do you use iBGP multipath as well to load-balance between links on
different routers?

I know eBGP multipath is fairly common, but I wonder how many are
using iBGP multipath as well. I doubt any carriers would support it,
so it's probably only useful for load-balancing outbound traffic. The
problem with eBGP multipath alone is that you might want to terminate
circuits from a given carrier on two different routers for redundancy
reasons, but that precludes any load-balancing with eBGP multipath.
Obviously your network has to be designed with equal-cost paths for
iBGP multipath to be of any value.

-Doug

  

-- 
Steve King

Network Engineer - Liquid Web, Inc.
Cisco Certified Network Associate
CompTIA Linux+ Certified Professional
CompTIA A+ Certified Professional



Current thread: