nanog mailing list archives
Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing
From: Jason Biel <jason () biel-tech com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:07:49 -0600
We actually used both tests to finally narrow down the TCP window size issue. We first used the UDP test to make sure the link was good. Jason On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Simon Horman <horms () verge net au> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 06:49:05AM -0600, Jason Biel wrote:Linux always worked best for us as well, was easy running a livecd with laptops. We found that two windows XP machines, same identical hardwareandOS load yielded different registry settings (or lack thereof) for TCPWindowsetting.I would have thought that (netperf's) UDP tests were more appropriate than TCP for testing link speed. Am I missing the point?
-- Jason Biel
Current thread:
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing, (continued)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 02)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jon Meek (Nov 02)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Kevin Oberman (Nov 07)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Andreas Ott (Nov 02)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Christopher Morrow (Nov 02)
- RE: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Benoit VANNIER (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jason Biel (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Bret Clark (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jason Biel (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Simon Horman (Nov 04)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jason Biel (Nov 05)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jason Biel (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing William F. Maton Sotomayor (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing ml (Nov 05)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jason Bertoch (Nov 05)
- Re: Email filtering and protection Help Phil Regnauld (Nov 05)
- RE: Email filtering and protection Help Jason Gurtz (Nov 05)