nanog mailing list archives
Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing
From: Simon Horman <horms () verge net au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:54:14 +1100
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 06:49:05AM -0600, Jason Biel wrote:
Linux always worked best for us as well, was easy running a livecd with laptops. We found that two windows XP machines, same identical hardware and OS load yielded different registry settings (or lack thereof) for TCP Window setting.
I would have thought that (netperf's) UDP tests were more appropriate than TCP for testing link speed. Am I missing the point?
Current thread:
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing, (continued)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Michael Painter (Nov 02)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Richard A Steenbergen (Nov 02)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Michael Painter (Nov 02)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jon Meek (Nov 02)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Kevin Oberman (Nov 07)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Andreas Ott (Nov 02)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Christopher Morrow (Nov 02)
- RE: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Benoit VANNIER (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jason Biel (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Bret Clark (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jason Biel (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Simon Horman (Nov 04)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jason Biel (Nov 05)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jason Biel (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing William F. Maton Sotomayor (Nov 03)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing ml (Nov 05)
- Re: Speed Testing and Throughput testing Jason Bertoch (Nov 05)
- Re: Email filtering and protection Help Phil Regnauld (Nov 05)
- RE: Email filtering and protection Help Jason Gurtz (Nov 05)