Re: AH or ESP

[Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com>]

Yes, thats what i had meant !

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Christopher Morrow <
morrowc.lists () gmail com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It is well known in the community that AH is NAT unfriendly while ESP
> cannot
> > be filtered, and most firewalls would not let such packets pass. I am NOT
>
> 'the content of the esp packet can't be filtered in transit' I think
> you mean... right?
>
> > interested in encrypting the data, but i do want origination
> authentication
> > (Integrity Protection). Do folks in such cases use AH or ESP-NULL, given
> > that both have some issues?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Glen