nanog mailing list archives
Re: AH or ESP
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:16:04 -0400
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Glen Kent <glen.kent () gmail com> wrote:
Hi, It is well known in the community that AH is NAT unfriendly while ESP cannot be filtered, and most firewalls would not let such packets pass. I am NOT
'the content of the esp packet can't be filtered in transit' I think you mean... right?
interested in encrypting the data, but i do want origination authentication (Integrity Protection). Do folks in such cases use AH or ESP-NULL, given that both have some issues? Thanks, Glen
Current thread:
- AH or ESP Glen Kent (May 22)
- Re: AH or ESP Christopher Morrow (May 22)
- Re: AH or ESP Glen Kent (May 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Glen Kent (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Jack Kohn (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Randy Bush (May 26)
- RE: AH or ESP Tony Hain (May 26)
- Re: AH or ESP Merike Kaeo (May 25)
- Re: AH or ESP Christopher Morrow (May 22)