nanog mailing list archives
Re: Usage-Based Billing for DIA
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 19:41:37 -0600
Once upon a time, Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org> said:
1) we have customers on policed ports, and the interface snmp counters count packets before service-policy. It doesn't seem right to bill for packets we dropped :)...so this isn't useful data for billing purposes.
Not sure how you are policing, but I belive both Juniper and Cisco have MIBs that show the policed traffic. For example, when we used Cisco CAR to limit traffic on some ports, I set up Cricket to monitor both the base port and the CAR stats (so we could see how much traffic was actually passed). I haven't got around to doing it for Juniper firewall policers, but I pretty sure the info is in a MIB. -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- Usage-Based Billing for DIA Rodriguez, Mauricio (Mar 05)
- Re: Usage-Based Billing for DIA Wim Kerkhoff (Mar 05)
- Re: Usage-Based Billing for DIA Jon Lewis (Mar 05)
- Re: Usage-Based Billing for DIA Jack Carrozzo (Mar 05)
- Re: Usage-Based Billing for DIA Chris Adams (Mar 05)
- Re: Usage-Based Billing for DIA Sam Stickland (Mar 09)
- Re: Usage-Based Billing for DIA Jon Lewis (Mar 24)
- Re: Usage-Based Billing for DIA Joe Loiacono (Mar 06)
- Re: Usage-Based Billing for DIA Andy Davidson (Mar 06)