nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google Over IPV6
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:08:23 +0000
On 27/03/2009 15:26, Leo Bicknell wrote:
AFAIK you have to have native peering with them to be part of the pilot. At least, you did when we signed up. They may have relaxed that since.
According to a Google IPv6 talk I attended yesterday, they don't intend to relax that rule. Tunneling ipv6 connectivity over ipv4 is trash quality engineering and to be honest, its not a credible substitute for adequate ipv6 infrastructure.
Nick
Current thread:
- Re: Google Over IPV6, (continued)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Shaun Ewing (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Daniel Verlouw (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Charles Wyble (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Shaun Ewing (Mar 27)
- RE: Google Over IPV6 Robert D. Scott (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Grzegorz Janoszka (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Rob Evans (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Leo Bicknell (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Nick Hilliard (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Joel Jaeggli (Mar 31)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Matthew Moyle-Croft (Mar 31)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 28)