nanog mailing list archives
Re: Google Over IPV6
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:26:14 -0500
In a message written on Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:03:05AM -0400, Robert D. Scott wrote:
When I posted my original note, I was not really looking for end user feedback, but rather is anyone peering V6 with them on either a public fabric or private peer. Any idea if they have native V6 transit, or are tunneling, and to where.
AFAIK you have to have native peering with them to be part of the pilot. At least, you did when we signed up. They may have relaxed that since. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Google Over IPV6, (continued)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Daniel Verlouw (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Shaun Ewing (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Daniel Verlouw (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Steven M. Bellovin (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Charles Wyble (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Shaun Ewing (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Daniel Verlouw (Mar 27)
- RE: Google Over IPV6 Robert D. Scott (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Grzegorz Janoszka (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Rob Evans (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Leo Bicknell (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Nick Hilliard (Mar 27)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Joel Jaeggli (Mar 31)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Matthew Moyle-Croft (Mar 31)
- Re: Google Over IPV6 Bernhard Schmidt (Mar 28)