nanog mailing list archives
Re: Akamai wierdness
From: Paul Wall <pauldotwall () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:00:44 -0400
Nothing is unfounded. I've previously had issues reaching Akamai at noc () akamai com, which is why I suggested that the poster try the ccare@ address. It was subsequently demonstrated (by Patrick and others) that the noc@ account is currently monitored satisfactorily. Any further discussion would be off-topic, so I'll bow out now. Drive Slow. Paul Wall
Current thread:
- Akamai wierdness John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Mar 22)
- RE: Akamai wierdness Paul Stewart (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Paul Wall (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 23)
- RE: Akamai wierdness Paul Stewart (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Charles Wyble (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Mar 22)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Paul Wall (Mar 23)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 24)
- Re: Akamai wierdness Paul Wall (Mar 24)
- Re: Akamai wierdness jamie rishaw (Mar 24)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 24)
- RE: Akamai wierdness Paul Stewart (Mar 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Akamai wierdness Jeffrey Cohen (Mar 25)
- Re: Akamai wierdness JC Dill (Mar 25)