nanog mailing list archives
Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning?
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:10:11 +0000
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Joe Maimon wrote:
TCP needs drops to manage to the right speed.This is whats bad. TCP should be slightly more intelligent and start considering rtt jitter as its primary source of congestion information.
TCP Vegas did this but sadly it never became popular. (It doesn't compete well with Reno.) Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD.
Current thread:
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning?, (continued)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Lars Eggert (Mar 16)
- RE: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Frank Bulk - iName.com (Mar 16)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Brett Frankenberger (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Leo Bicknell (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Marian Ďurkovič (Mar 18)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Leo Bicknell (Mar 18)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Marian Ďurkovič (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Joe Maimon (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? John Schnizlein (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Tony Finch (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Lars Eggert (Mar 17)