nanog mailing list archives
Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning?
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert () nokia com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:13:59 -0700
Hi, On 2009-3-16, at 7:09, Leo Bicknell wrote:
My wish is for the vendors to step up. I would love to be able to configure my router/cable modem/dsl box with "queue-size 50ms" and have it compute, for the current link speed, 50ms of buffer.
if the vendors got active and deployed better queueing schemes, that'd be great.
In the meantime, we've also started some work that will allow bulk transfer applications to transmit in a way that is designed to minimize queue lengths: http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ledbat-charter.html
Lars
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description:
Current thread:
- Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Marian Ďurkovič (Mar 16)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? David Andersen (Mar 16)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Leo Bicknell (Mar 16)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Wayne E. Bouchard (Mar 16)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Lars Eggert (Mar 16)
- RE: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Frank Bulk - iName.com (Mar 16)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Brett Frankenberger (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Leo Bicknell (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Marian Ďurkovič (Mar 18)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Leo Bicknell (Mar 18)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Marian Ďurkovič (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Joe Maimon (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? John Schnizlein (Mar 17)
- Re: Shady areas of TCP window autotuning? Tony Finch (Mar 17)