nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds?
From: Charles Wyble <charles () thewybles com>
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:28:07 -0700
Sounds like a lot of work to me. Wouldn't it be easier to just find the carrier neutral colo facilities where all the peering/transit between major networks happens, and pay them money to put up a fake wall that you can colo your optical taps behind?
Yeah.... it's not like that's ever gonna happen! :)
Drive Slow, and remember, don't open any doors that say "This Is Not An Exit",
ROFL
Current thread:
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds?, (continued)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Jason Fesler (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Dave Pooser (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Dave Wilson (Jun 02)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Deepak Jain (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Martin Hannigan (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Joel Jaeggli (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Paul Wall (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Peter Beckman (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? JC Dill (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Elmar K. Bins (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? JC Dill (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Shane Ronan (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Elmar K. Bins (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Martin Hannigan (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Martin Hannigan (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Peter Beckman (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Christopher Morrow (Jun 02)