nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds?
From: Jason Fesler <jfesler () gigo com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
The fact that they are so closely monitoring the construction and wanting to fix it that fast seems a bit over the top for redundant systems.
Even despite what we saw recently in the SF bay area?If black helicopters are involved, I suspect this is about par on the paranoia scale.
Current thread:
- Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 01)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Warren Bailey (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Joel Jaeggli (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Deepak Jain (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Joel Jaeggli (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Jason Fesler (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Dave Pooser (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Dave Wilson (Jun 02)
- RE: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Deepak Jain (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Martin Hannigan (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Joel Jaeggli (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 01)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Paul Wall (Jun 02)
- Re: Fiber cut - response in seconds? Charles Wyble (Jun 02)