nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent input
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond () prolocation net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:28:38 +0200 (CEST)
Hi!
"Cogent's official stance on IPv6 is that we will deploy IPv6 when it becomes a commercial necessity. We have tested IPv6 and we have our plan for rolling it out, but there are no commercial drivers to spend money to upgrade a network to IPv6 for no real return on investment."
Thats strange they are running pilots with customers on v6 in Amsterdam.
Not really so strange. ISPs often pilot features (v6, multicast, etc) that they have no immediate intention of deploying, so that they have experience if and when it becomes profitable/sensible to deploy them.
Not from what i have been told, but hey i am not working there. We got a v6 transit offer as pilot from them so perhaps they are moving towards live service .... Would not be strange in this current stage...
Bye, Raymond.
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent input, (continued)
- Re: Cogent input Stephen Kratzer (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input manolo (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Steve Bertrand (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Bret Clark (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Stephen Kratzer (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Bret Clark (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Stephen Kratzer (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Bret Clark (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Dave Israel (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Daniel Verlouw (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Stephen Kratzer (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Jeroen Wunnink (Jun 12)
- Re: Cogent input Marshall Eubanks (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Joel Jaeggli (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- Re: Cogent input Michael K. Smith (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input kris foster (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input David Temkin (Jun 17)