nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent input
From: Bret Clark <bclark () spectraaccess com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:49:13 -0400
I'm skeptical as to where this info came from since this seems nothing more then nay-say? if people are going to make grandiose statements then they should justify them with reputable evidence. I would be extremely surprised if Cogent engineering isn't working on a IPv6 plan or doesn't have one already in place. Bret On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 10:37 -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
Stephen Kratzer wrote:And, they have no plans to support IPv6.Ouch! I hope this is a non-starter for a lot of folks. Steve
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent input, (continued)
- Re: Cogent input Marshall Eubanks (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Bret Clark (Jun 11)
- RE: Cogent input Zak Thompson (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Chuck Anderson (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input seph (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Stephen Kratzer (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input manolo (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Steve Bertrand (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Bret Clark (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Stephen Kratzer (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Bret Clark (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Stephen Kratzer (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Bret Clark (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Dave Israel (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Daniel Verlouw (Jun 11)