nanog mailing list archives

Re: Multi site BGP Routing design


From: Saqib Ilyas <msaqib () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:21:29 +0500

For a given interconnection between the upstream ISPs for the two site, once
the direct link goes down, the time required for site A to learn the new
route to site B and vice versa would be different with the different
proposed solutions, right?
Thanks and best regards

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Ivan Pepelnjak <ip () ioshints info> wrote:

To rephrase the OP's question, would it be BCP to acquire a
second ASN, and without further de-aggregating, continue
advertising each site's IP space to the DFZ, but from
dissimilar ASs as opposed to the same one?

This would definitely be the best approach. You're not introducing new IP
prefixes and you're not extending AS paths, so the net effect on the global
BGP routing is zero (OK, you might have to use the 4 byte AS number :).

Just make sure that both ISPs you connect to allow you to advertise
"transit" prefixes. If site A public link goes down, but the private link
is
up, site B will advertise its own address space plus site A's address space
with an extra AS number in the AS path (and the upstream ISP might filter
that).

Ivan

http://www.ioshints.info/about
http://blog.ioshints.info/





-- 
Muhammad Saqib Ilyas
PhD Student, Computer Science and Engineering
Lahore University of Management Sciences


Current thread: